Sunday, November 26, 2006

The Other Casualties of War
















You don't have to die to make the ultimate sacrifice


When war started in Iraq, a generation of U.S. women became involved as never before-- in a wider-than-ever array of jobs, for long deployments, in a conflict with daily bloodshed. More than 155,000 women have served in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Among their ranks are more than 16,000 single mothers, according to the Pentagon, a number that military experts say is unprecedented.

How these women have coped and how their children are managing has gone little noticed as the war stretches across a fourth year.

In the military, parental status is not a barrier to serving in a war. All deploy when the call comes -- single mothers, single fathers, married couples -- relying on a "family-care plan" that designates a caregiver for children when parents are gone.

But war duty can be especially difficult for single parents. A year ago, Sgt. Leana Nishimura returned to the United States to face practical difficulties, emotional issues, and unavoidable questions concerning her children: Will there be another deployment? What if a parent does not come back?



This is her story...



What strikes me most about this tragic story is that when Sgt. Nishimura returned home, her life in shambles, it was not the government who helped her get her get it back on track. She was broke, she had no job, no family, her kids were on the other side of the country with no means to get home, and she had no place to live even if she could bring them home.

The well-known charitable program, Operation Hero Miles, which donates airline miles to U.S. service members, was only geared to hospitalized troops and their families. She and her children did not qualify.

Fellow guardsmen offered to donate miles to her, only to learn that airlines would not allow such mileage transfers.

The pastor and elder of the church across the street delivered groceries.

Her new boss donated a bed for her daughter.

There were clothes and food and other help from volunteers.

Much of this happened because Nishimura was "adopted" by First Christian Church of Havre de Grace through a National Guard program, Partners in Care, which links needy soldiers with congregations.

Needy soldiers...

One of her senior officers, Maj. Timothy Mullen, wrote letters on her behalf, which inspired contributions for the plane tickets from three chapters of the 29th Division Association, a veterans group, and four churches.

Her children and their grandmother would board a Christmas day flight at a total cost of less than $1,500, covered largely by the generosity of strangers.

Private citizens, churches, and fellow soldiers. Not one ounce of help from the government she’d risked her life for. Not one penny from the government who tore her children’s live apart. How do you compensate for destroying a child emotionally?

Now multiply this scenario by at least ten thousand fold.

Think about this the next time you hear your president babble on about supporting our troops. There is no support for our troops. There are only shattered lives, and broken children...

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

The National Guard was never intended for international assignments; only for national assignments. It irritates me to no end what these Washington DC beltway politicians have done, and people let them get away with it. There is no accountability or penalties for these people. At the worst, they get voted out, but not held liable for the mess they make.


I added this about Howard Zinn yesterday. (You can also download it and listen to the mp3)


I'm adding this do it yourself impeachment guide link if anyone is interested. I've said for awhile now, that it unlikely that any of the elected officials could pass a Consititution Test, the very basic understanding of government.

Karen said...

Actually, the military does more now to help families than they've ever done before. I think perhaps whoever was trying to help her didn't do their research or contact the right departments or private agencies. It may be different for National Guard, but she's been on active duty, so I would think she'd get the same benefits. Anyway, for reference, here are to links to military aid sources. http://www.military.com/Resources/ResourcesContent/0,13964,31985,00.html and http://www.militaryonesource.com/skins/MOS/home.aspx

There are links in those two to other aid groups.

Additionally, this site http://www.lbeh.org/?home (Let's Bring Em Home 2006!) takes cash or credit card dontations not airline miles.

This site http://www.nmfa.org/site/PageServer?pagename=homepage takes cash (or credit card) donations. Hell, the Red Cross does a lot to help out military personnel. I really think more could have been found for her more quickly than it was. The times I've dealt with military problems through the police, I've been nicely surprised at the kind of support there was for the families.

Kansas said...

I’m sure the government does some for the returning soldiers, maybe if you’ve been injured, and even that varies. But you hear story after story about vets returning to devastated lives with no place to turn for help.

I checked out the Military One Source link. If I were a vet needing help, this place would do me no good. While it offers lots of articles on what to do, it offers no concrete help. I clicked on their “Money Matters” link to see what they offered and it was just suggestions on how to budget, how to invest/save etc. When I clicked on their “Resources” link, it wanted me to register, and for that you actually have to be in the military.

Your first link, www.military.com, again only led to more links. I clicked on the bottom link, Military Support Services, and got more blahblahblah. They do offer some links (I’m pretending I’m a soldier/wife of here, looking for financial help), so I clicked on the Army Emergency Relief link and this organization is a private, non-profit group. The other links:

Air Force Aid Society – Private, non-profit

Navy-Marine Relief Society – Private

TAPS – Private

The rest of the links are obvious private groups and so I won’t go through them all.

Let's Bring Em’ Home 2006! – Private- non-profit

NMFA (National Military Family Association) seems to be chocked full of info, mostly to private resources for help.

Actually, I’m kind of fascinated by this hunt now. If you come across any other sites, toss the link in here. I’m thinking I may just go off on a little hunting expedition, pretend I’m soldier/wife of who needs financial help, and see what’s out there.

My whole point of this post was this; first off, I’m horrified that we are even letting single parents serve. I’m just as horrified that they would want to. When you’re a single parent, you don’t just get to go off and do anything you want to, including serving your country. But as I understand it, the woman in this story wasn’t single when she signed up.

The military should have refused her service, or at the very least, assigned her stateside.

But I strayed away from that main point because the obvious lack of financial help for our soldiers was just outrageous. In all the links you provided, and in all the subsequent links I found on those sites, there was mostly help from private organizations. I agree that there IS some help out there for soldiers and their families.

It’s just not coming from our government.

Anonymous said...

The woman in the article may not have had a choice. If she enlisted in the National Guard before 2000, the assumption then was a training period and then one weekend per month, and in national emergencies (um, "National", not "International").

All rules were changed after 9/11.

And as far as programs set up to assist veterans, that's what tax dollars should be used for primarily, with private non-profits as a secondary net.

That and they've cut the VA budget year-after-year and also veteran benefits.

Karen said...

Well, I can comment to the veterans benefits first hand (or maybe second hand, I guess). Those are not that bad. Free medical, disability if needed, but there has to be qualification. I know they've cut the benefits, but I have to ask you in all honesty if veterans who served for 2 years 40 years ago and had no diabilities are entitled to lifelong benefits?

I didn't mean to imply that the military does much financially for their personnel. The help is almost all private. But there is help. The point of the mil websites was that they do offer links to the private resources.

As to not allowing single parents to serve, I can see a big lawsuit over that. That's as discriminatory as not allowing women to fly in combat. Why a single parent would want to, I don't know. Maybe it's the best of their options.

Anonymous said...

Hi everyone, just got in and catching up on my reading. Hope y'all had a wonderful Thansgiving.
Being an immigrant it has a special meaning for me. Before I could speak English, my school put me
in the Thanksgiving play and I had to memorize words that I didn't know the meaning of. I was the
turkey, and the words were....gobble. gobble.......go figure.

Now Moo knows my feelings regarding bashing Republicans: Target rich, an excercise in futility.
But when it comes to how we treat our veterans, I have to speak out. Thankfully I'm in a position
where I don't have to avail of V.A. benefits, but many of my fellow vets do. Cait is right, to an extent,
that treatment, even very good treatment, is available. But it's dispensation is spotty at best, and if
the Repubs could have finished what they started in '94, when Newt Gingrich led the assault on the
lower 95% of Americans (Veterans included) when he took out "The Contract On America" there
wouldn't be any benefits to debate. The Taliban wing of the Republican Party (namely most of them)
considers ANY Gov't benefits as welfare. I worked very hard during the just past election to defeat
our two 6-term reps, Sue Kelly and John Sweeney. They were swept into office during the assault of
'94, and the immoral Karl Rove propaganda machine kept them in office....till now. Every time I saw
their picture in the paper visiting a VA hospital, smiling and talking with wheelchair bound Vets, I
wanted to do a Scarface Pacino assault on their headquarters. How they could sleep at night, or look
their family in their eyes, having voted "against" virtually every VA bill, and "for" every cut, is the
benchmark of the level we've stooped to in this country. The rating they earned from the Veterans of
Foreign Wars......"0", ZERO! The rating bestowed upon these two smiling hypocrites from the
Association of Purple Heart Recipients......."0." In a composite survey of all Veteran Associations,
they scored 25%. Not a single Democrat scored less than 88% while close to 200 scored 100%

So my point is: yes, some benefits are available, but they're a result of local angels doing the right
thing, and we shouldn't use an exception to define the bigger picture, namely the motives and goals of
what was started in '94
and gratefully stopped in '06.

Now let's get some fun type topics up here, Moo! Remember the "laughing rule." Don't make come to
Oklahoma .and have to hurt you. lol

Kansas said...

You want fun? I'll find you some fun. I’m like a fun magnet, fun just sticks to me like something on the bottom of your shoe. You know what’s funny? This morning I was working on a post about Mariah Carey and PETA. It was ripe with irony and ridiculousness and I was having much fun with it because I don’t like Mariah and I live to make fun of PETA (good causes, but full of poodleheads).

Clint walks in, sees what I’m working on and has the gall to say, “Isn’t that why you don’t like that Huffington Post, because they do pointless stories about stupid stars?”

The nerve! How dare he try to keep me on the straight and narrow! He can be a real fun vaccine sometimes.

Ok, I’m off; there’s fun out there that’s looking for a place to happen.

But feel free to continue the discussion.

Argon said...

Funny how I read more of those pointless stories on HuffPo than some of the other rants they have on there isn't it?

I guess it depends on your taste. Since some of the politicos are pretty rabid on there maybe it just adds a balance to it with the fluff right?

Didn't they dismiss the Gulf War Syndrome just like they dismised PTSD? They come up with a 1000 reasons to deny claims from the VA.

I stood next to jet engines for 4 years and had demonstrable hearing loss from the tests and they told me it was just ear wax causing it.

Karen said...

Ear wax? Holy shit. That's lame. My brother was hard of hearing from jet noise. Almost everyone in my husband's unit (Viet Nam) has PTSD. Or maybe all of them do. Huge incidence of diabetes. Lots of skin problems (Agent Orange).

LOL, Shooter, "The Taliban wing of the Republican Party". Wonderful analogy. Molly Ivins always calls the religious zealots the "Shi'ite Christians". Very apt.

Kansas said...

Yep they’re still denying that Gulf War Syndrome exists, so no benefits for them! They even fought vets in court over it so as to not have to pay for their treatment.

Slap a yellow ribbon on that!


Shooter, you’re such a rabble-rouser...